EfficientTimes.com
  • Politics
  • Tech News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
InvestingStock

Federal Versus State Policies

by May 22, 2025
May 22, 2025

Jeffrey Miron

What level of government—state or federal—should set economic and social policy?

The modern presumption is that “good” policies should be implemented federally. That is the logic behind the federal role in setting a minimum wage, providing Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security, imposing nationwide environmental regulations, and much more. If something “works,” so the thinking goes, why not apply it everywhere?

Yet there are reasons to prefer state-level control (if any), even if that sometimes produces less-than-ideal outcomes.

For starters, most policies involve a mix of positive and negative effects. And people differ on not only what is “good” but how to balance costs and benefits. A federal mandate forces national uniformity on divisive issues, such as abortion or school curricula. Letting states choose leaves room for calmer disagreement and lower polarization.

Further, government policies and programs tend to grow, especially those at the federal level, but state variation serves as a check. Critics worry about a “race to the bottom,” where states gut regulation to attract business or skimp on redistribution to avoid being a “welfare magnet.” But this tendency, to the extent it occurs, is a useful counterweight to the excessive expansion that is likely to occur when policies are made at the federal level. Plus, in practice, states often go beyond federal standards: Think of California’s aggressive emissions rules or Massachusetts’ expansion of Medicaid before the Affordable Care Act.

To be sure, state-level control has downsides. Some states may do too little—for example, they might underinvest in public health. And state-level variation means national companies face a patchwork of laws and regulations, which raises costs.

But these negatives are plausibly worth accepting to avoid one-size-fits-all federal policies. In particular, federalism likely works best when applied consistently across all policies, whether politically left or right.

This article appeared on Substack on May 22, 2025. Lucy Patalano, a student at Wellesley College, cowrote this post.

previous post
Trade Negotiations aren’t Chess, Poker, or Go. They’re Bridge.
next post
SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

You may also like

MACD + ADX: Spot the Pullbacks Worth Trading

May 22, 2025

Four Things the Senate Can Do to Improve...

May 22, 2025

SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But...

May 22, 2025

Become the Investor You Aspire to Be: Essential...

May 21, 2025

An Ominous Quiet on the Law Firm Revenge...

May 21, 2025

Generate Consistent Income with These Options Strategies

May 21, 2025

Quantum Stocks Explode: Why Traders Are Obsessed With...

May 21, 2025

S&P 500, Bitcoin & XLK: What the Charts...

May 20, 2025

A College Endowment Tax Is the Wrong Federal...

May 20, 2025

On the Expansion of Executive Power: Addendum

May 20, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • Trade Negotiations aren’t Chess, Poker, or Go. They’re Bridge.

    May 22, 2025
  • Trade Negotiations aren’t Chess, Poker, or Go. They’re Bridge.

    May 22, 2025
  • Regime Uncertainty and Market Uncertainty

    May 22, 2025
  • Regime Uncertainty and Market Uncertainty

    May 22, 2025
  • How Currency Shapes Global Trade: Exchange Rates, Investment, and Stability

    May 21, 2025
  • Plastic’s Quiet Role in Defeating Poverty

    May 21, 2025
  • About Us
  • Contacts
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2023 EfficientTimes.com All Rights Reserved.

EfficientTimes.com
  • Politics
  • Tech News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick